This is also known as Community Cultural Development. We include this overview here to inform readers who may be unfamiliar with community cultural development.
Community Cultural Development is funded by public or private groups to develop cultural outcomes for a local region. The outcomes take on a variety of forms such as theatre, sculpture, video, mosaics, prints, books, photography- a list as diverse as arts itself.
This work might be considered a new genre of collaborative art, reflecting some of the major developments of 20th century western art, which made audience participation an important part of the artistic experience. For example, rather than creating a public monument, a local government might opt to enlist artists to collaborate with local residents in creating artwork that often engages the community in examining local issues and identity.
In that spirit, community arts projects are often enlisted to be a part of community development. Effective community arts projects have shown the capacity for transformational cultural experiences. Such projects have dealt with racism: turning a community's diversity into its identity, or ageism: bringing isolated older people in contact with younger people.
While this work can take many forms and be conducted in many ways, we might consider that there are some common features of good projects. An artist acts as a facilitator for collaboration. Often, traditional methods of working are not appropriate, and an artist must be open to improvisation in order to allow for collaboration. A high level of trust is necessary for the community participants to open up to the artist and take risks. Building relationships between the artist and community are of prime importance to allow for the collaborative experience.
Whereas in traditional art, perhaps only the resulting product may affect the viewer, in community arts the process of creation becomes a major part of the experience that has a lasting effect.
This partly explains why a vibrant debate exists in this field regarding 'the quality of process' versus 'the quality of product'. Community artists will continue to debate this, as it is a source of creative tension in the work itself.